Using Personal Digital Inquiry and Web Literacy to Improve Foundational Skills
As I have explored web literacy and personal digital inquiry
(PDI), I have gained a deeper understanding of both their complexity as well as
their affordances. The process of PDI and reading the web requires students to
utilize new literacy skills as well as foundational skills simultaneously. This
can be challenging for even advanced students, even more so for struggling
readers. However, the affordances of digital tools, e-reading, and inquiry
itself could serve as a support for developing these foundational skills. This
thought led me to the idea of using web reading and PDI as reading
intervention.
One of
the tenants of PDI is for students to be the driving force behind their own
learning. It encourages them to explore their own questions instead of
answering ones given to them (Sorenson & Anderson, 2017). Engaging students
in inquiry teaches them more than how to learn, it teaches them how to think
and wonder. This is important for all students, but especially for those who
struggle.
Our learners who struggle in reading or other academic areas typically have low self-esteem regarding school. When classroom tasks and curriculum are continuously difficult for them, it makes it learning arduous and discouraging. PDI can allow teachers to reach these learners in a new way. Through the process of PDI, students interact in an authentic experience to seek true understanding (Sorenson & Anderson, 2017).. When the student holds value in the end result, then they better understand the purpose of the process Centering learning around students’ interests keeps it relevant and meaningful (Kroustallaki et al., 2015). Supporting students in their exploration can contribute to their feeling of competence and worthwhileness. Case studies involving PDI have shown this positive effect on students' attitudes (Kroustallaki et al., 2015). With this disposition and support, struggling students can gain so much through PDI.
The
complexity of web reading and PDI requires the process to be broken down into
easily manageable steps, which many frameworks such as QUEST (Dobler &
Eagleton, 2015) provide. Structuring each component of a PDI framework as a guided
intervention allows the teacher provide explicit instruction through an
empowering process. The multiple steps of inquiry address skills such as critical
thinking, metacognition, inferencing, analyzing, summarizing, and synthesizing.
Students will be more able to understand and utilize these complex skills when
they interact with them in an authentic way. As the constructivist theory
suggests, students learn through personal experience (Dobler & Eagleton,
2015).
Reading itself can be supported through digital and web reading. Affordances such as text-to-speech and embedded dictionary support can aid students who struggle with surface level reading. This can help make text and curriculum assessable to all learners (Dennis et al., 2015). Furthermore, multimodal representations of information can provide students with additional modes to help construct meaning in ways that traditional text cannot do.
Digital tools provide rich opportunities for students to communicate their understanding in the creation portion of PDI (Sorenson & Anderson, 2017). All students have different ways in which they express their thinking. Students who struggle with language and writing can be very restricted in adequately expressing their understanding through traditional writing. Having multiple modes such as photography, videos, cartoons, and podcasts can give students a voice they haven’t had (Smith & Okolo, 2010). The use of collaboration in this PDI process can expand these benefits as well.
I have seen first-hand how personal inquiry can
inspire students to be more engaged in their learning. Letting them be in
control of their learning helps establish a true learning community. I am hoping to strengthen this empowerment
through the use of a more structured and intentional framework of inquiry in my
classroom, and use it as a catalyst for intervention.
References
Dennis, D.P., Holmes, K.A., & Smith E. (2015). Exploring digital literacy practices in an inclusive classroom. The Reading Teacher, 69(2), 195-205.
Dobler,
E. & Eagleton, M.B. (2015). Reading the Web: Strategies for Internet
Inquiry, Second Edition . Guilford Press.
Kroustallaki, D., Kokkinanki, T., Sideridis, G.D., & Simos, P.G. (2015). Exploring students’ affect and achievement goals in the context of an intervention to improve web searching skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 156-170.
Smith,
S.J. & Okolo C. (2010). Response to intervention and evidence based
practices: Where does technology fit?. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(4),
257-272.
Sorenson,
E.K. & Andersen, H.V. (2017). Strengthening inclusion of learners with
attention difficulties through interventions with digital technology in
processes of production. European Journal of Open, Distance, and e-Learning,
20(1).




Nice infographic. Thanks for the ties to your own learning.
ReplyDelete